Last week we had the wonderful opportunity to welcome the Vis Moot Teams Bayreuth, Frankfurt, Heidelberg and Mainz for two rounds of excellent pleadings. It was a pleasure to get to know the teams and our fingers are crossed for the upcoming competition!
https://schmitzpartner-ffm.de/wp-content/uploads/2025/04/vis-moot-1.webp340910Schmitz & Partnerhttps://schmitzpartner-ffm.de/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/logo_schmitz-partner-ffm.pngSchmitz & Partner2025-03-25 17:36:552025-04-24 14:38:13Willem C. Vis Moot at Schmitz & Partner
There are currently serious deficiencies in the legal protection function of D&O insurance. Although general insurance terms and conditions now consistently stipulate that the insurer is only released from liability after a legally binding determination of a knowing breach of duty by the insured person, coverage of legal defense costs is still refused in individual cases on the grounds that the insurer was deceived at the time of conclusion or extension of the contract because the insured person had already knowingly breached obligations at that time.
https://schmitzpartner-ffm.de/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/logo_schmitz-partner-ffm.png00Schmitz & Partnerhttps://schmitzpartner-ffm.de/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/logo_schmitz-partner-ffm.pngSchmitz & Partner2025-03-24 13:12:562025-04-02 14:07:36Newsletter 01/2025 – Significant deficiencies in the legal protection function of the D&O
Willem C. Vis Moot at Schmitz & Partner
/in S&P News/by Schmitz & PartnerLast week we had the wonderful opportunity to welcome the Vis Moot Teams Bayreuth, Frankfurt, Heidelberg and Mainz for two rounds of excellent pleadings. It was a pleasure to get to know the teams and our fingers are crossed for the upcoming competition!
Newsletter 01/2025 – Significant deficiencies in the legal protection function of the D&O
/in Newsletter/by Schmitz & PartnerThere are currently serious deficiencies in the legal protection function of D&O insurance. Although general insurance terms and conditions now consistently stipulate that the insurer is only released from liability after a legally binding determination of a knowing breach of duty by the insured person, coverage of legal defense costs is still refused in individual cases on the grounds that the insurer was deceived at the time of conclusion or extension of the contract because the insured person had already knowingly breached obligations at that time.